Arizona Metals Extends Kay2 Zone 450 m Below Discovery Hole at Kay Deposit

    Date:

    /NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO US NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES/

    TORONTO, Feb. 5, 2025 /CNW/ – Arizona Metals Corp. AMC, AZMCF (the “Company” or “Arizona Metals”) is pleased to announce two new drill results from the Kay2 Zone and two holes from the West target at the Kay deposit in Arizona. In the Kay2 Zone, drill hole KM-24-173 intersected mineralization 450 m down-dip from hole KM-24-166, the first hole in the Kay2 Zone (Figure 1). Results for KM-24-173 were 2.4 m @ 2.7% CuEq (Table1). The new zone of mineralization, the Kay2 Zone, is located approximately 100 m north of previously drilled mineralization in the Kay deposit.

    Duncan Middlemiss, President and CEO of Arizona Metals, comments: “This large down-dip stepout in the Kay2 Zone is very encouraging, as it confirms mineralization almost half a kilometer below the outstanding intercept in drill hole 166. We currently have two drill rigs aimed even deeper, probing the vertical extents of both the Kay2 Zone and the main Kay deposit. We have drilled a total of 6,300 m in the Kay2 Zone, with 4,400 additional meters planned for Kay2 and Kay during Q1 of 2025. We expect Kay2 Zone mineralization to contribute to the upcoming mineral resource estimate for the Kay deposit, which is on track for H1 2025.”

    The deep drill holes currently underway are intended to serve as trunk holes to allow multiple branch holes to further test the size of the Kay2 Zone and deeper Kay deposit mineralization. One drill hole in the Kay2 Zone located 160 m downdip of hole 166, KM-24-170A, encountered no significant assays; this is not uncommon in deformed volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits where mineralization tends to pinch and swell. Two additional holes in the West target intersected the West target horizon: holes KM-24-172 and 174 intersected anomalous Cu, Au, and Zn or sulfide minerals where expected within the mineralized horizon. With the completion of recent drill holes, Arizona Metals has drilled a total of 127,000 meters on the property.

    Table 1. Results of Phase 3 Drill Program at the Kay Project, Yavapai County, Arizona announced in this news release.

    Analyzed Grade

    Analyzed Metal

    Equivalent

     Metal Equivalent

    Hole ID

    From

    m

    To m

    Length

    m

    Cu

    %

    Au

    g/t

    Zn

    %

    Ag

    g/t

    Pb

    %

    CuEq

    %

    AuEq

    g/t

    ZnEq

    %

    CuEq

    %

    AuEq

    g/t

    ZnEq

    %

    KM-24-170A

    no significant assays

    KM-24-172

    no significant assays

    KM-24-173

    1142.5

    1145.0

    2.4

    2.83

    0.01

    0.03

    3.5

    0.01

    2.88

    4.73

    7.50

    2.67

    4.38

    6.95

    KM-24-174

    no significant assays

    The true width of mineralization is estimated to be 50% to 99% of reported core width, with an average of 76%. (2) Assumptions used in USD for the copper and gold metal equivalent calculations were metal prices of $4.63/lb Copper, $1937/oz Gold, $25.20/oz Silver, $1.78/lb Zinc, and $1.02/lb Pb. Assumed metal recoveries (rec.), based on a preliminary review of historic data by SRK and ProcessIQ, were 93% for copper, 92% for zinc, 90% for lead, 72% silver, and 70% for gold. The following equation was used to calculate copper equivalence: CuEq = Copper (%) (93% rec.) + (Gold (g/t) x 0.61)(70% rec.) + (Silver (g/t) x 0.0079)(72% rec.) + (Zinc (%) x 0.3844)(92% rec.) + (Lead (%) x 0.2203)(90% rec.). The following equation was used to calculate gold equivalence: AuEq = Gold (g/t)(70% rec.) + (Copper (%) x 1.638)(93% rec.) + (Silver (g/t) x 0.01291)(72% rec.) + (Zinc (%) x 0.6299)(92% rec.) +(Lead (%) x 0.3609)(90% rec.). Analyzed metal equivalent calculations are reported for illustrative purposes only. The metal chosen for reporting on an equivalent basis is the one that contributes the most dollar value after accounting for assumed recoveries.

    Figure 1. Oblique section looking northeast, displaying new drill holes reported in this release. See Table 1 for additional details. The true width of mineralization in this area is yet to be determined. See Table 1 for constituent elements, grades, metals prices and recovery assumptions used for AuEq g/t and CuEq % calculations. Analyzed Metal Equivalent calculations are reported for illustrative purposes only. (CNW Group/Arizona Metals Corp.)

    About Arizona Metals Corp

    Arizona Metals Corp owns 100% of the Kay Project in Yavapai County, which is located on 1669 acres of patented and BLM mining claims and 193 acres of private land that are not subject to any royalties. An historic estimate by Exxon Minerals in 1982 reported a “proven and probable reserve of 6.4 million short tons at a grade of 2.2% copper, 2.8 g/t gold, 3.03% zinc, and 55 g/t silver.” The historic estimate at the Kay Deposit was reported by Exxon Minerals in 1982. (Fellows, M.L., 1982, Kay Mine massive sulphide deposit: Internal report prepared for Exxon Minerals Company)

    The Kay Mine historic estimate has not been verified as a current mineral resource. None of the key assumptions, parameters, and methods used to prepare the historic estimate were reported, and no resource categories were used.  Significant data compilation, re-drilling and data verification may be required by a Qualified Person before the historic estimate can be verified and upgraded to be a current mineral resource. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify it as a current mineral resource, and Arizona Metals is not treating the historic estimate as a current mineral resource.

    The Kay Mine is a steeply dipping VMS deposit that has been defined from a depth of 60 m to at least 900 m. It is open for expansion on strike and at depth.

    The Company also owns 100% of the Sugarloaf Peak Property, in La Paz County, which is located on 4,400 acres of BLM claims. Sugarloaf is a heap-leach, open-pit target and has a historic estimate of “100 million tons containing 1.5 million ounces gold” at a grade of 0.5 g/t (Dausinger, N.E., 1983, Phase 1 Drill Program and Evaluation of Gold-Silver Potential, Sugarloaf Peak Project, Quartzsite, Arizona: Report for Westworld Inc.)

    The historic estimate at the Sugarloaf Peak Property was reported by Westworld Resources in 1983. The historic estimate has not been verified as a current mineral resource. None of the key assumptions, parameters, and methods used to prepare the historic estimate were reported, and no resource categories were used.  Significant data compilation, re-drilling and data verification may be required by a Qualified Person before the historic estimate can be verified and upgraded to a current mineral resource. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify it as a current mineral resource, and Arizona Metals is not treating the historic estimate as a current mineral resource.

    Qualified Person and Quality Assurance/Quality Control

    All of Arizona Metals’ drill sample assay results have been independently monitored through a quality assurance/quality control (“QA/QC”) protocol which includes the insertion of blind standard reference materials and blanks at regular intervals. Logging and sampling were completed at Arizona Metals’ core handling facilities located in Phoenix and Black Canyon City, Arizona. Drill core was diamond sawn on site and half drill-core samples were securely transported to ALS Laboratories’ (“ALS”) sample preparation facility in Tucson, Arizona. Sample pulps were sent to ALS’s labs in Vancouver, Canada, and Reno, Nevada, for analysis.

    Gold content was determined by fire assay of a 30-gram charge with ICP finish (ALS method Au-AA23). Silver and 32 other elements were analyzed by ICP methods with four-acid digestion (ALS method ME-ICP61a). Over-limit samples for Au, Ag, Cu, and Zn were determined by ore-grade analyses Au-GRA21, Ag-OG62, Cu-OG62, and Zn-OG62, respectively. 

    ALS Laboratories is independent of Arizona Metals Corp. and its Vancouver and Reno facilities are ISO 17025 accredited. ALS also performed its own internal QA/QC procedures to assure the accuracy and integrity of results. Parameters for ALS’ internal and Arizona Metals’ external blind quality control samples were acceptable for the samples analyzed. Arizona Metals is not aware of any drilling, sampling, recovery, or other factors that could materially affect the accuracy or reliability of the data referred to herein.

    The qualified person who reviewed and approved the technical disclosure in this release is David Smith, CPG, a qualified person as defined in National Instrument43-101–Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Mr. Smith supervised the preparation of the scientific and technical information that forms the basis for this news release and has reviewed and approved the disclosure herein. Mr. Smith is the Vice-President, Exploration of the Company.  Mr. Smith supervised the drill program and verified the data disclosed, including sampling, analytical and QA/QC data, underlying the technical information in this news release, including reviewing the reports of ALS, methodologies, results, and all procedures undertaken for quality assurance and quality control in a manner consistent with industry practice, and all matters were consistent and accurate according to his professional judgement. There were no limitations on the verification process.

    Disclaimer

    This press release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking information” (collectively, “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of the applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements and are based on expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release. Any statement that discusses predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance (often but not always  using phrases such as “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “forecasts”, “estimates”, “believes” or “intends” or variations of such words and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or results “may” or “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken to occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release include, without limitation, statements regarding the expansion potential of the Kay Project, statements regarding drill results and future drilling of the Kay2 and Kay during Q1 of 2025,  , the contribution of the Kay2 Zone mineralization to the mineral resource estimate for the Kay deposit, and the mineral resource estimate being completed in H1 2025.In making the forward- looking statements contained in this press release, the Company has made certain assumptions. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that the expectations of any forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: availability of the Company to stay well funded; delay or failure to receive required permits or regulatory approvals; and general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements and information contained in this press release. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any intention and assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions, changes in factors affecting such forward- looking statements or otherwise.

    THE TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE HAS NEITHER REVIEWED NOR ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE

    www.arizonametalscorp.com

    https://x.com/ArizonaCorp

    Arizona Metals Logo (CNW Group/Arizona Metals Corp.)

    SOURCE Arizona Metals Corp.

    Cision View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2025/05/c6362.html

    Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

    Go Source

    Chart

    SignUp For Breaking Alerts

    New Graphic

    We respect your email privacy

    Share post:

    Popular

    More like this
    Related

    Whale Watching: AI and Global Growth

    Stephen Yiu joins Andrew Wilkinson to reveal his strategy...

    Bond Traders Like the Treasury Department Today

    Your Privacy When you visit any website it may use...

    Lackluster Earnings, ISM, Treasury Guidance Suppresses Yields: Feb. 5, 2025

    Investors were embracing the risk-off playbook today as lackluster...

    Automating Financial Strategies with Python Bots

    The article “Automating Financial Strategies with Python Bots” was...